|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Liberty Eternal
   |
Posted - 2011.01.09 10:11:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Block Ukx
Not in the Exchange, Don't Invest!
I can't believe you still have this slogan up when Titans4U was registered on your exchange, with absolutely no oversight or auditing on your behalf.
Talk about being pulled over by the weight of your own balls.
|
Liberty Eternal
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 22:39:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Marko box
stuff
I don't think Kalrand put it up as a troll, it's just there as a kind of mandatory risk warning for a financially unsound product.
It's also factually true - locking in isk through a 40% withdrawl fee is a ponzi no matter what way you look at it.
|
Liberty Eternal
|
Posted - 2011.01.22 11:28:00 -
[3]
Well, colour me cynical but I'm not convinced, not in the slightest. And the attempt to make this into a Kalrand thing when multiple people have raised the same questions as him is just cringeworthy. Responding to your critics by trying to isolate and discredit them will only create a Voltaire or a Cicero.
|
Liberty Eternal
|
Posted - 2011.01.22 13:06:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Liberty Eternal on 22/01/2011 13:07:53
Originally by: Block Ukx
Edited by: Block Ukx on 22/01/2011 12:50:09
LE,
IĈm not surprised. So, you support groundless attacks and calling people scammers without a shred of evidence.
You did, in fact, give inconsistent and misleading information out in public. You did this regarding your balance sheet, regarding the role of your directors, and on the issue of an audit.
If a person bringing a one-billion-isk offering to MD evaded, ignored and mislead as much as you have done then they would be questioned and called a scammer if they failed to respond properly.
And remember - you are the one who coined the slogan "not in the exchange, don't invest". You are the one who claimed to have some mythically high standard of "openness" and "accountability".
And also, you have still not answered a single question that was asked of you or resolved any of the [very basic] issues. So there are no groundless attacks or lack of evidence [except the lack of real information that you have chosen to create]. The fact that you consider all the criticism to be groundless just implicates you even more.
Edit: typo
|
Liberty Eternal
|
Posted - 2011.02.21 03:42:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Poison
Fine, Capital ships almost ready to be audited. You find someone one to do it?
Do you know what the word "audit" means?
|
Liberty Eternal
|
Posted - 2011.02.21 04:10:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Poison
Originally by: Liberty Eternal
Originally by: Poison
Fine, Capital ships almost ready to be audited. You find someone one to do it?
Do you know what the word "audit" means?
Do you know what "constructive" Means?
Here's a constructive suggestion - don't try to refer to the accounts of a dummy company as an audit. No-one in MD is stupid enough to believe that constitutes an audit when the main business hasn't been checked.
|
Liberty Eternal
|
Posted - 2011.02.22 20:42:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Block Ukx
The plan is very simple; make the corporation data available to everyone.
But verified by no-one
Originally by: Block Ukx
The data will be posted in our website,
You already have a mountain of information on your website, why do you think that putting more up will be equal to an audit?
Originally by: Block Ukx
and the Trustees role is to ensure that the posted data is correct.
Translation: Sencnes is our first, last and only line of defence
Originally by: Block Ukx
Again, since everyone has access to the corporation data, then anyone can verify that the financial information is correct.
Everyone except an auditor.
|
|
|
| |
|